be_themoon: I want a better world. By me. (Feminist: Text: emphasizing ur wimminz)
[personal profile] be_themoon
Things wot I am reading:

Liberty: The Lives and Times of Six Women in Revolutionary France by Lucy Moore. What I find really fascinating is that this really brilliant woman, Germaine de Stael, clever, witty, talented, was also against women's rights. And she wasn't the only one of these women to be against women's rights! it's a really odd dichotomy. apparently it's partly because of Rousseau, who was popular? and part of the argument against the old Regime was that it had let women gain positions of power (even though this wasn't really true - women gained an illusion of power, but they had almost no real control, and to gain it they had to sacrifice their reputations). so yeah, I find that strange.

Date: 2009-10-29 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lassiterfics.livejournal.com
No, that makes sense. If you slap a label like "women's rights" over things that purport to further women's causes but in its turn it has to dismantle the only system they know in which women CAN get power, then I can understand the apprehension. It was a man's world and it was hard enough for a woman to make it, and if we dismantle this world then it's going to be twice as hard for the women as for the men to climb up, because it was always twice as hard for the women. It seems like de Stael was just trying to protect women, or at least women of certain means, even if her attempts were misguided.

What was her beef with Rousseau? What did he do?

Date: 2009-11-02 12:12 am (UTC)
ext_80109: (BSG: Apollo: smile)
From: [identity profile] be-themoon.livejournal.com
no, she was thoroughly for the Revolution! and for the dismantling of women's power! that's the weird thing. and Rousseau was (theoretically) very insistent that women's place was in the family only, and she was a huge fan of his. whole thing is a bit strange.

Date: 2009-10-29 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rodwen-fefalas.livejournal.com
I have a friend who is JUST LIKE THAT. I'm not kidding - brilliant, could go on to do *extraordinary* things, but she's a mysoginist. Total mysoginist. Wants a controlling, arrogant, demeaning, gorgeous, chiseled man.
I don't understand this lack-of-logic.

Oh, and she's a huge fan of Rousseau, so I guess that says something?

Date: 2009-11-02 12:13 am (UTC)
ext_80109: (Feminist: Text: emphasizing ur wimminz)
From: [identity profile] be-themoon.livejournal.com
I... I fail to understand this type of mindset in people! no sense. none at all!

possibly? he was very much for women being submissive, theoretically. (in real life he was a bit... odd.)

Date: 2009-10-30 03:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fadedelegance.livejournal.com
Yeah, female misogynists never fail to baffle me. -___-

Date: 2009-11-02 12:14 am (UTC)
ext_80109: (Feminist: Text: emphasizing ur wimminz)
From: [identity profile] be-themoon.livejournal.com
it is so confusing! *baffled*

Date: 2009-11-02 03:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fadedelegance.livejournal.com
Frankly, I think women like that are brainwashed because they grew up in a misogynistic environment and were conditioned not to think for themselves and to believe that women really should have an inferior status.

Profile

be_themoon: I want a better world. By me. (Default)
I can learn to stand alone

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
151617181920 21
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios